Gaskin v. Gaskin

105 S.E. 369, 150 Ga. 756, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 329
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1920·No. No. 1876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

1. The evidence being conflicting as to the cause of the separation — as to whether the wife voluntarily left the husband or was forced to leave him because of actual and threatened personal violence, the judge did not abuse his discretion in allowing as alimony the sum awarded for the support of the child, and counsel fees to the wife. Aiken v. Aiken, 131 Ga. 578 (62 S. E. 820).

2. The petition praying for an allowance of attorney’s fees, there was no.error, merely because there was not a distinct allegation that the plaintiff was compelled to employ an attorney, in awarding attorney’s fees. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaskin v. Gaskin, 105 S.E. 369, 150 Ga. 756, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 329 (Ga. 1920).

105 S.E. 369 (Gaskin v. Gaskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brannen v. Brannen
65 S.E.2d 161 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)