Gaskill v. Clarke

56 A.2d 873, 141 N.J. Eq. 270, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 617
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.2d 873 (Gaskill v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaskill v. Clarke, 56 A.2d 873, 141 N.J. Eq. 270, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 617 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land.

A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree entered in the Court of Chancery should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Bueling, Wells, Dill, Feeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.2d 873, 141 N.J. Eq. 270, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaskill-v-clarke-nj-1948.