Gaskill v. Clarke
This text of 56 A.2d 873 (Gaskill v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land.
A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree entered in the Court of Chancery should be affirmed.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Bueling, Wells, Dill, Feeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.2d 873, 141 N.J. Eq. 270, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaskill-v-clarke-nj-1948.