Gaschler v. State

916 So. 2d 903, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17975, 2005 WL 3053582
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2005·No. No. 4D05-2317·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record reflects that Appellant’s post-conviction motion was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

GUNTHER, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaschler v. State, 916 So. 2d 903, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17975, 2005 WL 3053582 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

916 So. 2d 903 (Gaschler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.