Gasch v. Niehoff

Appellate Court of Illinois

Gasch v. Niehoff

54 Ill. App. 680, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 206

DecidedMay 28, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 54 Ill. App. 680 (Gasch v. Niehoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gasch v. Niehoff, 54 Ill. App. 680, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 206 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Issues were joined upon the allegations upon which the writ of attachment was issued, with the result that the jury found for the defendant.

We do not agree with appellants in their contention that the evidence was such that we ought to set aside the conclusion reached by the court and jury before whom the cause was tried.

Ho other ground for a reversal is urged. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Issues were joined upon the allegations upon which the writ of attachment was issued, with the result that the jury found for the defendant.

We do not agree with appellants in their contention that the evidence was such that we ought to set aside the conclusion reached by the court and jury before whom the cause was tried.

Ho other ground for a reversal is urged. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Ill. App. 680, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gasch-v-niehoff-illappct-1894.