Gas Co. v. . Raleigh

75 N.C. 274
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1876·Published

Opinion

The only point in this case is covered by Tucker v. Raleigh, at this term. It is there decided that the Funding Act of February, 1875, did not require the sanction of the popular vote.

We think, however, that the judgment ought to have been an alternativemandamus, as the city may show cause, as that it prefers to pay the debt rather than fund, etc.

PER CURIAM. Judgment accordingly.

Cited: Mayo v. Comrs., 122 N.C. 22; Wadsworth v. Concord, 133 N.C. 593;Water Co. v. Trustees, 151 N.C. 175. *Page 207

(275)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gas Co. v. . Raleigh, 75 N.C. 274 (N.C. 1876).

75 N.C. 274 (Gas Co. v. . Raleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson Water Co. v. Trustees of Henderson Graded Schools
151 N.C. 171 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)