Garza v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided September 11, 2020·No. 4:19-cv-03423·Unknown

Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 11, 202¢ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION ARNOLDO GARZA, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-3423 § THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 20) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on August 19, 2020 regarding Instrument 18. Plaintiff timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objections and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (Sth Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court. The Clerk shall enter this Order and provide all parties with a true copy. SIGNED on this nell day of September, 2020, at Houston, Texas. Cyehereand VANESSA D. GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garza v. United States, (S.D. Tex. 2020).

Garza v. United States (Garza v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related