Garza v. State

351 S.W.2d 248, 171 Tex. Crim. 420, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4495
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 22, 1961·No. No. 33964·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

The offense is operating an automobile without the owner’s consent; the punishment, thirty days in jail and a fine of $25.

In examining the complaint and information we find the statutory requisite of Art. 1341, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., is not properly alleged as to the value of the automobile operated without the consent of the owner, Manuel Valdez.

The above article, as amended by act of the 56th Legislature, 1959, makes it necessary to allege the value of a motor vehicle in cases of this kind, and fixes punishment, misdemeanor, under Sec. “a” when the vehicle is valued at less than $200; and under Sec. “b” when the vehicle is valued at more than $200 a possible punishment may be assessed for any term not exceeding three years in the penitentiary.

Even though no objection has been urged, we regard the above error as fundamental; accordingly, the cause is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garza v. State, 351 S.W.2d 248, 171 Tex. Crim. 420, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4495 (Tex. 1961).

351 S.W.2d 248 (Garza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
576 S.W.2d 843 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Barnes v. State
467 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Hart v. State
396 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Ex Parte Sawyer
386 S.W.2d 275 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)