Garza v. State

246 S.W.2d 635, 157 Tex. Crim. 6
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 1951
Docket25510
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 246 S.W.2d 635 (Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garza v. State, 246 S.W.2d 635, 157 Tex. Crim. 6 (Tex. 1951).

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is possession of marijuana, a narcotic drug; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant was arrested and searched by police officers who observed him coming out of a dark alley in the business district of Corpus Christi shortly after midnight.

Officer Wilkins testified that he and his fellow officer searched appellant and found a few traces of what he believed to be marijuana in the cuffs of his trousers and a marijuana cigarette in his hat band.

Appellant relies upon two bills of exception. Bill No. 1 complains of the testimony regarding the search, and Bill No. 2 of the marijuana cigarette as an exhibit.

Both bills set out the ground of the objection as follows:-

“* * * that the results of such search of the defendant was inadmissible under the provisions of Article 727a, Code of Criminal Procedure of the State of Texas, in that the arrest of the defendant was an illegal arrest as being in violation of Articles 212, 213, 215, and 217, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, said arrest being made without a warrant, and that a proper predicate had not been laid under Article 725b of the Penal Code of Texas so as to authorize a search of the defendant * * *”

Nowhere in the bills does the trial court certify that in fact the officers had no search warrant, that in fact the officers had no warrant of arrest, or that in fact a proper predicate had not been laid for the search.

It follows that the bills are deficient and show no reversible *8 error. See Martinez v. State, No. 25,563 (Page 91, this volume), 246 S. W. (2d) 633 this day decided and cases there cited.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephen v. State
293 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Huskey v. State
246 S.W.2d 636 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Veasey v. State
247 S.W.2d 255 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Martinez v. State
246 S.W.2d 633 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 S.W.2d 635, 157 Tex. Crim. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garza-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.