Garza v. Richmond

Court of Appeals of Texas

Garza v. Richmond

249 S.W. 889, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 719

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 7, 1923

DocketNo. 6889.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 249 S.W. 889 (Garza v. Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garza v. Richmond, 249 S.W. 889, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 719 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PLY, C. J.

Appellant sued appellee for the sum of $300,. evidenced by four checks, two for $50 each, and two for $100 each. The defense was that the checks were' given for gambling debts in Mexico. The court rendered judgment in favor of appellee.

The evidence, while quite meager, is sufficient to show that appellee had gone across the Rio Grande to Piedras Negras, and while there became intoxicated and began playing at roulette, with $75 he had gone over with, and, after losing that sum, obtained the $300 from appellant on his checks, and soon lost that on the roulette table. The evidence indicates that appellant kept a saloon and a gambling house, and that the $75 and the amounts advanced on the checks were lost on the gaming device of appellant, and all went into his coffers. Appellant not only got the $75, but also got back the money for which the checks were given.

The checks were given for gambling purposes at a gaming table being run in the interest of appellant. He lost nothing, and the court very properly refused to lend itself .to the collection of a debt founded' on a gambling consideration. This is well settled by Texas decisions. •

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLY, C. J.

Appellant sued appellee for the sum of $300,. evidenced by four checks, two for $50 each, and two for $100 each. The defense was that the checks were' given for gambling debts in Mexico. The court rendered judgment in favor of appellee.

The evidence, while quite meager, is sufficient to show that appellee had gone across the Rio Grande to Piedras Negras, and while there became intoxicated and began playing at roulette, with $75 he had gone over with, and, after losing that sum, obtained the $300 from appellant on his checks, and soon lost that on the roulette table. The evidence indicates that appellant kept a saloon and a gambling house, and that the $75 and the amounts advanced on the checks were lost on the gaming device of appellant, and all went into his coffers. Appellant not only got the $75, but also got back the money for which the checks were given.

The checks were given for gambling purposes at a gaming table being run in the interest of appellant. He lost nothing, and the court very properly refused to lend itself .to the collection of a debt founded' on a gambling consideration. This is well settled by Texas decisions. •

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 S.W. 889, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garza-v-richmond-texapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack