Garza v. La Salle County, Texas
Opinion
April 23, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION
KAYLA GARZA, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-96 § LASALLE COUNTY, et al., § § § Defendant. §
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the parties’ proposed Agreed Final Judgment, (Dkt. No. 30), and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. No. 31), both pertaining to the settlement of the claims brought on behalf of minor Plaintiffs A.G. and K.G. In his report and recommendation, Magistrate Judge dos Santos recommends that the Court approve the proposed settlement pertaining to minor Plaintiffs A.G. and K.G. (Id. at 1). All parties, including the Guardian ad Litem representing the minor Plaintiffs, waived objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Id. at 4). Given that there are no objections, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(1), the Court reviewed the report and recommendation and applied the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no abuse of discretion or clearly erroneous findings, the Court hereby ADOPTS IN WHOLE the report and recommendation. Accordingly, the parties’ Agreed Final Judgment, (Dkt. No. 30), is APPROVED. A final judgment will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED on April 23, 2025. 4 A. Kazen / | ted States District Vudge
2/2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garza v. La Salle County, Texas (Garza v. La Salle County, Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.