Garza, Humberto
This text of Garza, Humberto (Garza, Humberto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,113-01
EX PARTE HUMBERTO GARZA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE NO. CR-3175-04-G IN THE 370 TH DISTRICT COURT HIDALGO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
In March 2005, a jury found applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. See
T EX. P ENAL C ODE § 19.03(a). Based on the jury’s answers to the statutory punishment
questions, the trial court sentenced him to death.1 This Court affirmed applicant’s
conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Garza v. State, No. AP-75,217 (Tex. Crim.
1 See Art. 37.071. Unless otherwise indicated all references to Articles refer to the Code of Criminal Procedure. Garza - 2
App. Apr. 30, 2008)(not designated for publication). Applicant’s counsel timely filed
applicant’s initial application for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court on July 19,
2007. However, this Court did not receive that writ record until April 1, 2015.
After reviewing the twenty-eight allegations applicant raised in his application,
this Court remanded the third allegation, in which applicant asserted that his trial counsel
failed to conduct a constitutionally adequate investigation of mitigating evidence, to the
trial court for further development. Ex parte Garza, No. WR-78,113-01 (Tex. Crim. App.
Mar. 23, 2016)(not designated for publication). We gave the trial court 90 days to resolve
the remanded issue and 120 days for the supplemental record to be forwarded to this
Court.
However, before the record was due in this Court, the trial court sent to this Court
a request for an extension. The trial court asked that we grant it until December 20, 2016
to resolve the issues in the case. That time has now passed, and the case is well overdue
in this Court. Therefore, the trial court has 60 days to resolve the issue remanded to it and
have the supplemental record forwarded to this Court. Any extensions of time shall be
requested by the trial judge, or on his or her behalf, and obtained from this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garza, Humberto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garza-humberto-texcrimapp-2017.