Gary Webster v. State of Arkansas

2019 Ark. App. 454
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 16, 2019
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2019 Ark. App. 454 (Gary Webster v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gary Webster v. State of Arkansas, 2019 Ark. App. 454 (Ark. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 454 Digitally signed by Elizabeth ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Perry Date: 2022.08.03 13:59:08 DIVISION IV -05'00' No. CR-19-240 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered October 16, 2019 GARY WEBSTER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAIGHEAD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, V. WESTERN DISTRICT [NOS. 16JCR-17-796; 16JCR-17-7; STATE OF ARKANSAS 16JCR-10-377; 16JCR-09-1262] APPELLEE HONORABLE PAMELA HONEYCUTT, JUDGE

AFFIRMED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

Gary Webster appeals the Craighead County Circuit Court’s finding that he violated

the conditions of his suspended imposition of sentence (SIS) and probation. On appeal, he

argues that the State failed to prove that his failure to comply with the conditions was willful.

We affirm.

In CR-09-1262, Webster was charged with failure to register as a sex offender. In

CR-10-377, Webster was again charged with failure to register and with living near a school

or a daycare. In November 2012, he pled guilty in both cases and received a sentence of

five years’ SIS on each count. In CR-17-7, Webster was once again charged with failure

to register. He pled guilty and was sentenced to six years’ SIS. And finally, in CR-17-796,

Webster was charged yet again with failure to register.

1 In July 2017, the State petitioned to revoke Webster’s probation in CR-09-1262,

CR-10-377, and CR-17-7 because he had failed to live a law-abiding life, which had

resulted in his arrest in CR-17-796, and because he had failed to pay court costs as ordered.

He pled guilty to the charge in CR-17-796 and to the petition to revoke in the other cases.

In CR-17-796, he was sentenced to five years’ probation; in each of the other cases, he was

sentenced to five years’ SIS.

In July 2018, the State petitioned to revoke Webster’s probation and SIS based on

his failure to live a law-abiding life, pay court costs, and report to his probation officer.

Webster had again been charged with failure to register (CR-18-506). In September 2018,

the State amended its petition to include a failure to report a change of address and living

within 2000 feet of a youth center or daycare facility.

The circuit court convened a revocation hearing on 7 September 2018. Natasha

Kaja, a sex-offender-registration specialist at the Jonesboro Police Department, testified that

Webster is a Level 3 sex offender and that he had last verified his information with her on

April 13. On that day, Webster said he was living at Econo Lodge on Phillips Drive. Kaja

reminded him that he could not live within 2000 feet of a school, park, daycare, or youth

center, which meant he could stay only at the hotels closest to Phillips Drive and Caraway

Road in Jonesboro. Kaja next saw Webster on April 26, when he advised her that he was

moving to West Memphis, although he did not have a new address. He again said he had

been staying at Econo Lodge, but when Kaja presented proof that he had not been living

there, he admitted that he had been staying at Park Place Inn and at Rodeway Inn, which

are both within 2000 feet of a daycare. Kaja said that Webster was arrested that day for

2 failure to comply with reporting. He called her on April 30, the day he was released, and

said he would be staying at Days Inn, but she advised him that he could not stay there

because it was within 2000 feet of a daycare. He then said he would return to Econo Lodge,

and that was the last contact Kaja had with him.

Officer Ethan Sanderlin testified that on 22 April 2018, he responded to a welfare

check at Rodeway Inn on Caraway Road and spoke to Webster. Webster told Sanderlin

that “his time had run out at the Econo Lodge and that he was looking for a new place to

live.” Webster did not have a room at Rodeway Inn at that time.

Officer Adam Hampton testified that he spoke with Webster on April 24 at Park

Place Inn. Webster said that he had been living at Econo Lodge but had recently been

evicted. Hampton asked if he had contacted Kaja, and Webster said he had not.

Robert Holt, the Days Inn manager, testified that Webster had stayed at the hotel

on April 28–30, May 11–17, and June 18–21. Webster used a credit card to reserve his

room for each stay. Micki Patel, the Econo Lodge manager, testified that Webster had

stayed there April 13–21 and April 30–May 2.

Tammy Hubble, the staff accountant for the Craighead County Sheriff’s Department,

testified that Webster had not made payments on any of his cases and that he owed court

costs in CR-09-1262 and CR-10-377 in the amount of $512.

Cameron Sailor, Webster’s probation officer, testified that Webster is required to

meet with him once a month but had failed to do so. Sailor said he met with Webster only

two times, April 10 and April 16. Webster failed to report on May 1. Webster is also

required to report within twenty-four hours if he has been incarcerated and released; Sailor’s

3 records showed that Webster was arrested on April 26 and released on April 28, arrested on

May 2 and released on May 9, and arrested on May 11. Webster did not report on April

29 or May 10. Sailor confirmed that Webster was in jail on his report dates in June, July,

August, and September.

Detective Bill Brown testified that he was familiar with Webster and that Webster

had allegedly been living at Days Inn on or around June 18. Brown said that Arkids Pediatric

Day Center is located approximately 878 feet from Days Inn.

Webster testified that he is sixty-seven years old and that he has been on disability

since 1988. His disability and Social Security benefits total $770 a month. He explained

that he left Econo Lodge on April 21 because “they started gouging me for rent.” He said

he had $5100 in money orders and that “a man” had seen them. He was confused about

the dates of his arrests, and he denied being told to report to his probation officer. He also

said his probation officer threatened him by telling him that staying at Econo Lodge was a

“terrible idea.” He claimed that he had been paying his court costs from 2009 and 2010.

On cross-examination, he explained that the $5100, which he put in the bank, was Social

Security back pay.

Finally, Casey Gibson, a deputy at the Craighead County Detention Center,

confirmed that Webster had been detained April 26–28, May 2–9, May 20–June 18, and

July 6–present.

The circuit court found that Webster had failed to report to his probation officer

after his release from jail and had not paid costs as ordered. The court revoked Webster’s

probation in CR-17-796 and his SIS in CR-09-1262, CR-10-377, and CR-17-7. He was

4 sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment in each case, to run concurrently, and has now timely

appealed.

A suspended sentence may be revoked when a circuit court finds by a preponderance

of the evidence that the defendant has inexcusably failed to comply with a condition of

suspension. Jackson v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 125. When the alleged violation is a failure to

make payments as ordered, it is the State’s burden to prove that the failure to pay was

inexcusable; once the State has introduced evidence of nonpayment, the burden of going

forward shifts to the defendant to offer some reasonable excuse for failing to pay. Reese v.

State, 26 Ark. App. 42, 759 S.W.2d 576 (1988). Factors to be considered in determining

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shadrack Ward v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 170 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)
David Veasley v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 491 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)
Shykeen Daniels v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 1 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)
Anastasia Turner v. State of Arkansas
2019 Ark. App. 534 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 Ark. App. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-webster-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2019.