Gary Wayne Flim v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 21, 2013·No. 14-13-00846-CR·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00846-CR

GARY WAYNE FLIM, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1361607

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 2, 2013, we dismissed appellant’s attempted appeal in this case for lack of jurisdiction. Flim v. State, 14-13-00220-CR, 2013 WL 1867600 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 2, 2013, no pet.) (not designated for publication). Appellant has filed another notice of appeal in this trial court cause number from the trial court’s failure to grant him permission to appeal.

Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to post-conviction relief from a final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07; Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding that article11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, McCally, and Donovan. Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary Wayne Flim v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Gary Wayne Flim v. State (Gary Wayne Flim v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)