Gary Walker v. RRRB
This text of Gary Walker v. RRRB (Gary Walker v. RRRB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 98-3997 ___________
Gary James Walker, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Railroad Retirement Board. * Railroad Retirement Board, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * ___________
Submitted: December 7, 1999
Filed: December 10, 1999 ___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Gary James Walker petitions for review of an order of the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) denying his appeal. Walker contends the Board erroneously decided it was required to honor a state court order that a portion of Walker's Railroad Retirement Act disability benefits be paid to his former wife. Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the Board's finding that it was required by law and regulation to comply with the order was supported by substantial evidence. See 45 U.S.C. § 231m(b)(2); 20 C.F.R. §§ 295.2-.4; King v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 981 F.2d 365, 367 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Board.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary Walker v. RRRB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-walker-v-rrrb-ca8-1999.