Gary Walker, Jr. v. Honorable Judge Taylor Christopher Hutton

Fourth Circuit

Gary Walker, Jr. v. Honorable Judge Taylor Christopher Hutton

56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154, 1995 WL 323721

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1995

Docket95-6427

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 63 (Gary Walker, Jr. v. Honorable Judge Taylor Christopher Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gary Walker, Jr. v. Honorable Judge Taylor Christopher Hutton, 56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154, 1995 WL 323721 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gary WALKER, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Honorable Judge TAYLOR; Christopher Hutton, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6427.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 31, 1995.

Gary Walker, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. Taylor, No. CA-94-1649-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gary WALKER, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Honorable Judge TAYLOR; Christopher Hutton, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6427.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 31, 1995.

Gary Walker, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. Taylor, No. CA-94-1649-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154, 1995 WL 323721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-walker-jr-v-honorable-judge-taylor-christophe-ca4-1995.