Gary v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gary v. State

366 S.E.2d 833, 186 Ga. App. 231, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 132

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 4, 1988

Docket75711

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 366 S.E.2d 833 (Gary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gary v. State, 366 S.E.2d 833, 186 Ga. App. 231, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 132 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for theft by shoplifting after being sentenced as a recidivist under the authority of OCGA § 16-8-14 (b) (1) (C). Held:

In his sole enumeration of error, defendant contends the trial court erred in dismissing the jury after a verdict had been rendered and making a determination without the intervention of a jury as to the recidivist counts of the indictment. This contention is without merit.

In cases such as the one sub judice, “the trial court alone determines the punishment to be imposed. See OCGA § 17-10-2 (Code Ann. § 27-2503). Since recidivism is an issue only in the sentencing phase of a trial (see Parrish v. State, 160 Ga. App. 601 (7) (287 SE2d 603) (1981)), it follows that defendant had no right to a jury determination of this issue. See Jackson v. State, 158 Ga. App. 702 (6) (282 SE2d 181) (1981).” LaPalme v. State, 169 Ga. App. 540, 541 (4) (313 SE2d 729).

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Beasley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI