Gary v. State
257 S.E.2d 344, 150 Ga. App. 201, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2117
Opinion
The sole complaint in this appeal from a conviction for shoplifting is that the judge at one point spoke of appropriation of the thing taken to "its” rather than "the defendant’s” own use. Taken in context and as a whole, the error, an obvious slip of the tongue, could not have been misleading. Griffis v. State, 242 Ga. 26 (247 SE2d 833) (1978).
Judgment affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gary v. State, 257 S.E.2d 344, 150 Ga. App. 201, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2117 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).
257 S.E.2d 344 (Gary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yeargin v. State
298 S.E.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)