Gary v. New Haven, No. Cv 99-0430938s (Mar. 26, 2003)
Opinion
After the plaintiff rested, the defendant moved to dismiss on the grounds that the plaintiff had not produced evidence that the alleged defect existed long enough to put the defendant on actual or constructive notice of its existence. The defendant relies on Colombo v. Stop and ShopSupermarket Company, Inc.,
That case is virtually identical to this case, except for the fact that the fall was caused by milk in Colombo while here we are dealing with water.
While the existence of the nearby water fountain suggests the source of the water, we have no evidence as to how it got there or how long it was there.
The defendant's motion is granted and the case is dismissed.
Anthony V. DeMayo Judge Trial Referee
CT Page 4199
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 4198 (Gary v. New Haven, No. Cv 99-0430938s (Mar. 26, 2003)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.