Gary v. Eastabrook
This text of 6 Cal. 457 (Gary v. Eastabrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The plaintiff cannot recover upon his sheriff’s deed, because the interest conveyed to him is undefined and uncertain.
Under the Homestead Act, it is the duty of the appraisers to ascertain and report the value of the land. Then as five thousand dollars taken from the sum of the valuation is to the remainder of the valuation, so will be the proportion of undivided interest in the property which is subject to be sold under execution.
To illustrate this so as to prevent any misapprehension: suppose a piece of property to be sold except the homestead interest; if the value of the whole is found by the appraisement to be twenty-seven thousand dollars; then as five thousand dollars is five twenty-sevenths of the sum, the remainder is twenty-two twenty-sevenths, and consequently it is ascertained that the proportion to be sold out of the property is twenty-two twenty-sevenths of the whole undivided.
This inode will render to each party in interest a certain and definite estate. Without giving this construction to the statute, some of its provisions would be beyond the power of a Court to enforce.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-v-eastabrook-cal-1856.