Gary v. Brewington
This text of Gary v. Brewington (Gary v. Brewington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8341
RONALD GARY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. BREWINGTON, RN; DOCTOR SHERMAN, MD; MR. DOIGHERTY, Director of Greenville County Detention Center; COUNTY OF GREENVILLE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (4:06-cv-02216-PMD-TER)
Submitted: July 13, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Gary, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Ronald Gary appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gary v.
Brewington, No. 4:06-cv-02216-PMD-TER (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2008).
We deny Gary’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary v. Brewington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-v-brewington-ca4-2009.