Gary v. Beadles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Gary v. Beadles

192 Ill. App. 459

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 28, 1915

DocketGen. No. 19,701

StatusPublished

This text of 192 Ill. App. 459 (Gary v. Beadles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gary v. Beadles, 192 Ill. App. 459 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 420*—when objection below to insufficiency of affidavit of merits essential. An objection that the affidavit of merits filed by the defendant in an action for attorney’s fees did not aver as grounds of defense that there had been an accord and satisfaction and that such fees had been paid, all of which was testified to by the defendant, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. 2. Appeal and error, § 883*—when instructions must be set out in full. Alleged error in giving instructions will not be considered on appeal or writ of error unless all the instructions given are set out in full in the abstract. 3. Appeal and error, § 1530*—when instruction harmless. An instruction, although subject to criticism, held not prejudicially erroneous where the testimony relative to the matters therein presented stands uncontradicted. 4. New trial, § 67*—when newly-discovered evidence not ground for new trial. Newly-discovered evidence held not of such a character as to warrant the granting of a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 420*—when objection below to insufficiency of affidavit of merits essential. An objection that the affidavit of merits filed by the defendant in an action for attorney’s fees did not aver as grounds of defense that there had been an accord and satisfaction and that such fees had been paid, all of which was testified to by the defendant, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. 2. Appeal and error, § 883*—when instructions must be set out in full. Alleged error in giving instructions will not be considered on appeal or writ of error unless all the instructions given are set out in full in the abstract. 3. Appeal and error, § 1530*—when instruction harmless. An instruction, although subject to criticism, held not prejudicially erroneous where the testimony relative to the matters therein presented stands uncontradicted. 4. New trial, § 67*—when newly-discovered evidence not ground for new trial. Newly-discovered evidence held not of such a character as to warrant the granting of a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-v-beadles-illappct-1915.