Gary Steven Danielson v. April Marie Danielson
This text of Gary Steven Danielson v. April Marie Danielson (Gary Steven Danielson v. April Marie Danielson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00219-CV
GARY STEVEN DANIELSON APPELLANT
V.
APRIL MARIE DANIELSON APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 231-551313-14
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On October 29, 2014, we received appellant’s “Request For Additional
Time” to file the brief. The motion did not comply with the Tex. R. App. P. 9.1,
9.5, and 10.1(a)(5). On October 30, 2014, we requested an amended motion by
November 10, 2014. No motion was received.
On December 2, 2014, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court
within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: January 8, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary Steven Danielson v. April Marie Danielson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-steven-danielson-v-april-marie-danielson-texapp-2015.