Gary Ray Amburn v. State
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00052-CR
GARY RAY AMBURN, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 443rd District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 42046CR
ORDER
The Court granted appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief
to a date requested by appellant’s counsel, September 24, 2018. Nine days later, on
October 3, 2018, when no brief and no motion for further extension of time to file the brief
was filed, this appeal was abated to the trial court to hold a hearing to determine why no
brief had been filed. Prior to any ordered abatement hearing, appellant’s brief and a third
motion for extension of time to file his brief was filed on October 8, 2018. In the motion,
appellant’s counsel explained how busy counsel was during the time a brief should have been prepared but did not explain why counsel could not file a brief by the date counsel
had requested or why another motion for extension of time could not have been filed
before the Court abated this appeal.
Nevertheless, because appellant’s brief was filed, the Court reinstates this appeal
and grants appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief to the date the brief
was filed.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal reinstated Motion granted Order issued and filed October 17, 2018
Amburn v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gary Ray Amburn v. State (Gary Ray Amburn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.