Gary Railways v. Chumcoff
This text of 103 N.E.2d 203 (Gary Railways v. Chumcoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GARY RAILWAYS, INC.
v.
CHUMCOFF.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
*310 Draper & Eichhorn, of Gary, and George Sammons, of Kentland, for appellant.
Strom and Spangler, of Gary, for appellee.
BOBBITT, J.
This action is before us on petition to transfer from the Appellate Court under § 4-215, Burns' 1946 Replacement; Acts of 1933, ch. 151, § 1, p. 800, and was argued before this court by counsel for both appellant and appellee.
After due consideration Jasper and Bobbitt, JJ., reached the conclusion that the Appellate Court had correctly decided the issues presented and that the transfer should be denied. Gilkison, C.J., and Emmert, J., are of the opinion that the petition to transfer should be granted. Draper, J., did not participate because of his close relationship to one of the attorneys appearing for appellant.
Therefore, a majority of those judges participating not being in favor of the petition to transfer, it is denied.
Transfer denied.
Draper, J., not participating.
NOTE. Reported in 103 N.E.2d 203.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.E.2d 203, 230 Ind. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-railways-v-chumcoff-ind-1952.