Gary R. Barnes v. City of Coon Rapids
This text of 366 F. App'x 705 (Gary R. Barnes v. City of Coon Rapids) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary R. Barnes appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his suit against his former employer, the City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota, alleging negligence and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (ADA). On appeal, he also asserts a retaliation claim. After carefully reviewing de novo the grant of summary judgment on Barnes’s ADA claims, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006), we find no basis for reversal. We decline to consider either Barnes’s negligence claim, which he does not address on appeal, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir.2004) (claims not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned), or his retaliation claim, which he presents for the first time on appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir.2004).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
366 F. App'x 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-r-barnes-v-city-of-coon-rapids-ca8-2010.