Gary Pearlman v. Michael Borgia
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D19-1563 _____________________________
GARY PEARLMAN,
Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL BORGIA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.
July 29, 2019
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s order of June 19, 2019, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final and the appeal is premature because the order merely grants a motion and does not contain the requisite words of finality to make it an order entering a final appealable judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l); Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s request for clarification is denied.
LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Gary Pearlman, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gary Pearlman v. Michael Borgia (Gary Pearlman v. Michael Borgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.