Gary Leman v. Orit Tal
This text of Gary Leman v. Orit Tal (Gary Leman v. Orit Tal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 31, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2238 Lower Tribunal No. 22-31850-SP-05 ________________
Gary Leman, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Orit Tal, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana Gonzalez-Whyte, Judge.
Solnick Law P.A., and Peter J. Solnick, for appellants.
The Scharf Appellate Group, and Erik W. Scharf, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(a) (“To preserve for appeal a
challenge to the failure of the trial court to make required findings of fact in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing
under this rule.”); Schneider v. Tirikian, 397 So. 3d 1070, 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA
2024) (“The key to preservation is whether the trial court had an opportunity
to correct the purported error.”); Forte v. All Cnty. Towing Inc., 336 So. 3d
316, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (“An award of attorney’s fees will be upheld on
appeal so long as it is supported by competent, substantial evidence.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary Leman v. Orit Tal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-leman-v-orit-tal-fladistctapp-2025.