GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2022·No. 22-0511·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

GARY LEE HAMM, II, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-511 LT Case No. 2020-CF-003013-A-X

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed December 30, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Betty Wyatt, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following a jury trial. However, we remand for entry of an amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $100.00 (not $150.00) for the costs of prosecution consistent with the court’s oral pronouncement.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA (GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)