GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA (GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GARY LEE HAMM, II,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-511 LT Case No. 2020-CF-003013-A-X
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 30, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Betty Wyatt, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed
by the trial court following a jury trial. However, we remand for entry of an
amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $100.00 (not
$150.00) for the costs of prosecution consistent with the court’s oral
pronouncement.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.
WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-lee-hamm-ii-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.