GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2022
Docket22-0511
StatusPublished

This text of GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA (GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

GARY LEE HAMM, II,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-511 LT Case No. 2020-CF-003013-A-X

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 30, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Betty Wyatt, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed

by the trial court following a jury trial. However, we remand for entry of an

amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $100.00 (not

$150.00) for the costs of prosecution consistent with the court’s oral

pronouncement.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GARY LEE HAMM, II vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-lee-hamm-ii-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.