Gary Johnson v. Prime Auto Direct

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00474-CV Style: Gary Johnson v. Prime Auto Direct Date motion filed*: October 6, 2014 Type of motion: Third Agreed Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: August 25, 2014 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: October 9, 2014 Date Requested: November 8, 2014

Ordered that motion is:  Granted in part  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Although this Court referred the parties to mediation on June 25, 2014, no objections or other required notifications were filed. Instead, appellant filed two agreed motions to extend the time to file appellant’s brief, which were granted by the Clerk of this Court. Accordingly, the parties are ordered to file a response to the mediation order within 10 days of this order. Appellant’s motion is denied without prejudice to refiling after the filing of the response, with appellant’s brief deadline to be reset after such response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 38.6(a).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 14, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision