Gary J. Bruegging v. Frank G. Burke, in His Capacity as Acting Archivist of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
This text of 976 F.2d 45 (Gary J. Bruegging v. Frank G. Burke, in His Capacity as Acting Archivist of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
976 F.2d 45
59 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 768, 298
U.S.App.D.C. 97,
2 A.D. Cases 172
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Gary J. BRUEGGING,
v.
Frank G. BURKE, in his capacity as Acting Archivist of the
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, et al.
No. 88-5021.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
June 28, 1988.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, and MIKVA and HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellees' motion for summary affirmance, appellant's opposition thereto and appellees' reply, it is
ORDERED by the court that the motion be granted for the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 1987.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
976 F.2d 45, 1988 WL 342820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-j-bruegging-v-frank-g-burke-in-his-capacity-as-acting-archivist-of-cadc-1988.