Gary Houser, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellee v. City of Salem, Marian County, Oregon, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee
This text of 15 F.3d 1085 (Gary Houser, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellee v. City of Salem, Marian County, Oregon, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
15 F.3d 1085
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Gary HOUSER, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF SALEM, MARIAN COUNTY, OREGON, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee.
Nos. 91-35987, 91-35142.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 3, 1993.
Decided Feb. 8, 1994.
Before: TANG, POOLE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Having received the joint motion to dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal,
IT IS ORDERED that the above-numbered appeal and cross-appeal are DISMISSED. The action is REMANDED to the district court for approval of the settlement and dismissal of the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F.3d 1085, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-houser-plaintiff-appellee-appellee-v-city-of--ca9-1994.