Gary Harris v. Robbie Tucker
This text of Gary Harris v. Robbie Tucker (Gary Harris v. Robbie Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 06, 2017
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A18A0222. GARY HARRIS v. ROBBIE TUCKER.
Gary Harris sued Robbie Tucker in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Harris appealed to superior court, which entered judgment in favor of Tucker. Harris filed a motion for new trial, which the superior court denied. Harris then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Harris was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Harris’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/06/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary Harris v. Robbie Tucker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-harris-v-robbie-tucker-gactapp-2017.