Gary G. Zimmerman v. Legacy Brokerage, Inc.
This text of Gary G. Zimmerman v. Legacy Brokerage, Inc. (Gary G. Zimmerman v. Legacy Brokerage, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00400-CV ___________________________
GARY G. ZIMMERMAN, Appellant
V.
LEGACY BROKERAGE, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 23-10807-431
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On October 8, 2024, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible
for preparing the record in this appeal had informed us that appellant had not
arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record
and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,
we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: October 31, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary G. Zimmerman v. Legacy Brokerage, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-g-zimmerman-v-legacy-brokerage-inc-texapp-2024.