Gary Eugene Graham v. Falls City

111 F. App'x 852
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 2004
Docket04-1043
StatusUnpublished

This text of 111 F. App'x 852 (Gary Eugene Graham v. Falls City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gary Eugene Graham v. Falls City, 111 F. App'x 852 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Graham appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing two defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Because the order allowed process to be served upon the third defendant, the order is not final under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we lack jurisdiction to review it at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (courts of appeals have jurisdiction over appeals from final decisions of district courts); Bullock v. Baptist Mem’l Hosp., 817 F.2d 58, 59 (8th Cir. 1987) (order dismissing complaint as to fewer than all defendants is not final order within meaning of § 1291).

We deny as moot his pending motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as premature.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 F. App'x 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-eugene-graham-v-falls-city-ca8-2004.