Gary Edward Dean v. The State of Wyoming
This text of 2025 WY 13 (Gary Edward Dean v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
2025 WY 13
October Term, A.D. 2024
January 29, 2025
GARY EDWARD DEAN,
Appellant (Defendant),
v. S-24-0267
THE STATE OF WYOMING,
Appellee (Plaintiff).
ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional Alford guilty plea to one count of voyeurism. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-4-304(a) and (d). For this count, the district court imposed a 4 to 5-year sentence of incarceration and ordered restitution in the amount of $1,495. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s July 30, 2024, Judgment and Sentence.
[¶2] On December 4, 2024, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶3] Now, following a careful review of the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, and the record, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Judgment and Sentence, should be affirmed. It is, therefore,
[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Gary Edward Dean, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further
[¶5] ORDERED that the Natrona County District Court’s July 30, 2024, Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
[¶6] DATED this 29th day of January, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
KATE M. FOX Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 WY 13, 562 P.3d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-edward-dean-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2025.