Gary Dwayne Oatman v. State
This text of Gary Dwayne Oatman v. State (Gary Dwayne Oatman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Appellant's appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw. This Court may not grant the motion because the effect would be to leave the indigent appellant without counsel. Therefore, the motion is dismissed and counsel is instructed to refile his motion in the district court. That court may grant or deny the motion at its discretion. If counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court shall immediately appoint substitute counsel. A copy of the order appointing substitute counsel shall be forwarded to this Court.
The motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief is granted. The time for filing appellant's brief on appeal is extended for sixty days from today's date, subject to further extension.
It is ordered May 12, 2010.
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gary Dwayne Oatman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-dwayne-oatman-v-state-texapp-2010.