Gary Dean Wallis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 12, 2001
Docket06-01-00210-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gary Dean Wallis v. State (Gary Dean Wallis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gary Dean Wallis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-01-00210-CR
______________________________


GARY DEAN WALLIS, Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court
Franklin County, Texas
Trial Court No. 7013





Before Cornelius, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.
Opinion by Chief Justice Cornelius


O P I N I O N


Gary Dean Wallis has filed a motion in which he asks this Court to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.2, his motion is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.



William J. Cornelius

Chief Justice



Date Submitted: December 12, 2001

Date Decided: December 12, 2001



Do Not Publish

P="BR1">

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Michael Anthony Picard has appealed from a judgment taken in favor of Leon Zarzoza. We now have before the Court a joint motion to vacate the trial court's judgment and dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 and 43.2. The parties ask this Court to vacate the judgment of the trial court and dismiss this case with prejudice, with all costs taxed against the party who incurred them. The motion contains an internal date of February 3, 2003, but was not mailed until February 20. Between those dates, on February 11, 2003, we released our opinion in this appeal. Our clerk's office has contacted counsel for both parties, who assure this Court they still desire the relief sought by the motion.

It is therefore ordered that our judgment of February 11, 2003, is vacated. We withdraw our opinion of February 11, 2003. The judgment of the trial court is vacated, and the cause is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties. Costs are assessed against the party incurring such costs.

This Court's judgment is vacated, and the cause is dismissed.



Jack Carter

Justice



Date Submitted: March 5, 2003

Date Decided: March 6, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gary Dean Wallis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-dean-wallis-v-state-texapp-2001.