Gary D. Pentecost v. U-Haul Co of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 29, 2019·No. 01-18-01120-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 29, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-01120-CV ——————————— GARY D. PENTECOST, Appellant V. U-HAUL CO. OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2017-74757

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Gary D. Pentecost, has neither established indigence nor paid, or

made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(b). On March 8, 2019, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to

dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Goodman, and Landau.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary D. Pentecost v. U-Haul Co of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Gary D. Pentecost v. U-Haul Co of Texas (Gary D. Pentecost v. U-Haul Co of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.