Gary Christmas, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, William R. Christmas v. The El Reno Board of Education, Independent School District No. 34

449 F.2d 153, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7873
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 28, 1971·No. 709-70·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By his complaint plaintiff-appellant Christmas attacked the constitutionality of a school regulation pertaining to the length of a student’s hair. The district court denied declaratory and injunctive relief, 313 F.Supp. 618. The facts differ from Freeman v. Flake and other hair cases decided this day in that the student was not suspended but was refused the right to attend commencement exercises and to receive a diploma. Instead he was given a certificate of graduation and accompanying transcript which are the only officially recognized documents or records evidencing graduation.

The judgment is affirmed. See Freeman v. Flake, 10 Cir., 448 F.2d 258.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary Christmas, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, William R. Christmas v. The El Reno Board of Education, Independent School District No. 34, 449 F.2d 153, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7873 (10th Cir. 1971).

449 F.2d 153 (Gary Christmas, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, William R. Christmas v. The El Reno Board of Education, Independent School District No. 34) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christmas v. EL RENO BOARD OF ED., IND. SCH. DIST. NO. 34
313 F. Supp. 618 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1970)
Freeman v. Flake
448 F.2d 258 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)