Gary Chilton Ragsdale v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 19, 1968·No. 24809·Published

Opinion

395 F.2d 771

Gary Chilton RAGSDALE, Appellant,
v.
Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of
Corrections, Appellee.

No. 24809.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Leo Brewster, Judge.

Gary Chilton Ragsdale, pro se.

Robert E. Owen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Asst. Atty. Gen., A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Staff Legal Asst., R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender, Lonny F.Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the District Court is reversed and remanded for further consideration in the light of Peyton v. Rowe, 390 U.S. 978, 88 S.Ct. 1549, 20 L.Ed.2d 426.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary Chilton Ragsdale v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464 (5th Cir. 1968).

395 F.2d 771 (Gary Chilton Ragsdale v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peyton v. Rowe
391 U.S. 54 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Peyton v. Rowe
390 U.S. 978 (Supreme Court, 1968)