Gary Chilton Ragsdale v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 1968
Docket24809
StatusPublished

This text of 395 F.2d 771 (Gary Chilton Ragsdale v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gary Chilton Ragsdale v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

395 F.2d 771

Gary Chilton RAGSDALE, Appellant,
v.
Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of
Corrections, Appellee.

No. 24809.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Leo Brewster, Judge.

Gary Chilton Ragsdale, pro se.

Robert E. Owen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Asst. Atty. Gen., A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Staff Legal Asst., R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender, Lonny F.Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the District Court is reversed and remanded for further consideration in the light of Peyton v. Rowe, 390 U.S. 978, 88 S.Ct. 1549, 20 L.Ed.2d 426.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peyton v. Rowe
391 U.S. 54 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Peyton v. Rowe
390 U.S. 978 (Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-chilton-ragsdale-v-dr-george-j-beto-director--ca5-1968.