Gary C.B. v. Sandra I.M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gary C.B. v. Sandra I.M.

65 A.D.3d 861, 884 N.Y.S.2d 332

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 1, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.3d 861 (Gary C.B. v. Sandra I.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gary C.B. v. Sandra I.M., 65 A.D.3d 861, 884 N.Y.S.2d 332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Elizabeth Barnett, Ref.), entered on or about August 20, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioner father custody of the subject child and awarded visitation to respondent mother, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The referee’s conclusion that the award of custody to the father with liberal visitation to the mother was in the best interests of the child has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Osbourne S. v Regina S., 55 AD3d 465 [2008]; Matter of Brass v Otero, 40 AD3d 752 [2007]). The referee appropriately evaluated these best interests under the totality of the circumstances (see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 94-96 [1982]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Elizabeth Barnett, Ref.), entered on or about August 20, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioner father custody of the subject child and awarded visitation to respondent mother, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The referee’s conclusion that the award of custody to the father with liberal visitation to the mother was in the best interests of the child has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Osbourne S. v Regina S., 55 AD3d 465 [2008]; Matter of Brass v Otero, 40 AD3d 752 [2007]). The referee appropriately evaluated these best interests under the totality of the circumstances (see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 94-96 [1982]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.3d 861, 884 N.Y.S.2d 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-cb-v-sandra-im-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack