Gary Bass v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-10-00447-CV
|
Gary Bass |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Real Time Resolutions, Inc. |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On April 1, 2011, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 28, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gary Bass v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (Gary Bass v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.