GARY A. GOLDMAN v. KIM HART

N.D. Indiana

GARY A. GOLDMAN v. KIM HART

DecidedJune 8, 2026

Docket2:25-cv-00418

StatusUnknown

This text of GARY A. GOLDMAN v. KIM HART (GARY A. GOLDMAN v. KIM HART) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

GARY A. GOLDMAN v. KIM HART, (N.D. Ind. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

GARY A. GOLDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2:25-cv-418 KIM HART, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court sua sponte. Defendant submitted a copy of Chief Judge Leigh Martin May’s issued Order, dated April 6, 2026. [See DE 55]. The Order [1:24-cv-175- LMM, DE 57] sets aside the default judgment and order granting Goldman a default judgment. Chief Judge May then directed the Clerk to reopen the matter, and Defendant Hart timely filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [1:24-cv-175-LMM, DE 58]. Accordingly, the court VACATES the scheduled June 16th Proceeding Supplemental Cause Number 2:25-cv-418-PPS-APR and RECOMMENDS that the District Court DISMISS this case. This Report and Recommendation is submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties shall have fourteen days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection will result in waiver of the right to challenge this Recommendation before either the District Court or the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leininger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994); The Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989); Lebovitz v. Miller, 856 F.2d 902, 905 n.2 (7th Cir. 1988).

ENTERED this 8th day of June, 2026.

/s/ Andrew P. Rodovich United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

GARY A. GOLDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2:25-cv-418 KIM HART, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court sua sponte. Defendant submitted a copy of Chief Judge Leigh Martin May’s issued Order, dated April 6, 2026. [See DE 55]. The Order [1:24-cv-175- LMM, DE 57] sets aside the default judgment and order granting Goldman a default judgment. Chief Judge May then directed the Clerk to reopen the matter, and Defendant Hart timely filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [1:24-cv-175-LMM, DE 58]. Accordingly, the court VACATES the scheduled June 16th Proceeding Supplemental Cause Number 2:25-cv-418-PPS-APR and RECOMMENDS that the District Court DISMISS this case. This Report and Recommendation is submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties shall have fourteen days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection will result in waiver of the right to challenge this Recommendation before either the District Court or the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leininger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994); The Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989); Lebovitz v. Miller, 856 F.2d 902, 905 n.2 (7th Cir. 1988).

ENTERED this 8th day of June, 2026.

/s/ Andrew P. Rodovich United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

GARY A. GOLDMAN v. KIM HART, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gary-a-goldman-v-kim-hart-innd-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack