Garwood v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
22 N.E. 396, 116 N.Y. 649, 71 Sickels 649, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1379
Opinion
for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garwood v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 22 N.E. 396, 116 N.Y. 649, 71 Sickels 649, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1379 (N.Y. 1889).
22 N.E. 396 (Garwood v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strobel v. . Kerr Salt Co.
58 N.E. 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
New York Rubber Co. v. Rothery
30 N.E. 841 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)