Garwood v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.

22 N.E. 396, 116 N.Y. 649, 71 Sickels 649, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1379
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 8, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 N.E. 396 (Garwood v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garwood v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 22 N.E. 396, 116 N.Y. 649, 71 Sickels 649, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1379 (N.Y. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam mem.

for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.

All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.

Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strobel v. . Kerr Salt Co.
58 N.E. 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
New York Rubber Co. v. Rothery
30 N.E. 841 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 N.E. 396, 116 N.Y. 649, 71 Sickels 649, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garwood-v-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-rd-co-ny-1889.