Garvey v. Richy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garvey v. Richy

4 A.D.3d 327, 770 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1065

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 2004·Published

Opinion

[328] In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered May 7, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the third-party complaint is dismissed, and the main action is severed.

The third-party defendant, Steve H. Schaffner, met his burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Based on the undisputed testimony of the parties, the subject motor vehicle accident occurred when the defendant third-party plaintiff Nancy A. Richy backed her vehicle into Schaffner’s stopped vehicle. Richy failed to use such care to avoid the collision as an ordinarily prudent person would have used under the circumstances (see McGraw v Ranieri, 202 AD2d 725, 727 [1994]). In opposition, the third-party plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Santucci, J.E, Schmidt, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[328] In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered May 7, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the third-party complaint is dismissed, and the main action is severed.

The third-party defendant, Steve H. Schaffner, met his burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Based on the undisputed testimony of the parties, the subject motor vehicle accident occurred when the defendant third-party plaintiff Nancy A. Richy backed her vehicle into Schaffner’s stopped vehicle. Richy failed to use such care to avoid the collision as an ordinarily prudent person would have used under the circumstances (see McGraw v Ranieri, 202 AD2d 725, 727 [1994]). In opposition, the third-party plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Santucci, J.E, Schmidt, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Garvey v. Richy, 4 A.D.3d 327, 770 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

4 A.D.3d 327 (Garvey v. Richy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related