Garvey v. Oldbury Electro-Chemical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garvey v. Oldbury Electro-Chemical Co.

120 N.Y.S. 1124

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.Y.S. 1124 (Garvey v. Oldbury Electro-Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garvey v. Oldbury Electro-Chemical Co., 120 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the 7,000 cans delivered to defendant by plaintiff between March 2 and June 21, 1899, were so delivered to and received by defendant under an agreement that defendant should pay plaintiff therefor at the rate of $83 per thousand, and plaintiff has been paid the full purchase price thereof; also that the verdict, so far as it allows damages for the additional price claimed as to other cans furnished defendant by plaintiff, is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. See, also, 118 App. Div. 918, 103 N. Y. Supp. 1126; 132 App. Div. 945, 117 N. Y. Supp. 1135; 132 App. Div. 949, 118 N. Y. Supp. 1107.

SPRING, J.,

votes for modification,by reducing the verdict in the amount allowed for the 7,000 cans referred to, and for affirmance of the judgment as modified, together with the order.

KRUSE, J.,

votes for affirmance of the judgment and order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the 7,000 cans delivered to defendant by plaintiff between March 2 and June 21, 1899, were so delivered to and received by defendant under an agreement that defendant should pay plaintiff therefor at the rate of $83 per thousand, and plaintiff has been paid the full purchase price thereof; also that the verdict, so far as it allows damages for the additional price claimed as to other cans furnished defendant by plaintiff, is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. See, also, 118 App. Div. 918, 103 N. Y. Supp. 1126; 132 App. Div. 945, 117 N. Y. Supp. 1135; 132 App. Div. 949, 118 N. Y. Supp. 1107.

SPRING, J.,

votes for modification,by reducing the verdict in the amount allowed for the 7,000 cans referred to, and for affirmance of the judgment as modified, together with the order.

KRUSE, J.,

votes for affirmance of the judgment and order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garvey-v-oldbury-electro-chemical-co-nyappdiv-1910.