Garvey v. McNulty

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garvey v. McNulty

213 So. 2d 319, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5127

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1968

DocketNo. 67-1031

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 So. 2d 319 (Garvey v. McNulty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garvey v. McNulty, 213 So. 2d 319, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below from an adverse judgment rendered [320]*320upon a jury verdict which awarded damages to plaintiff. Previously this court had reversed a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant. See McNulty v. Garvey, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 234, wherein the principal facts are disclosed. On consideration of the several contentions made on behalf of the appellant, we conclude no reversible error has been shown, and affirm. The charges were properly tailored to the evidence presented, and the cause was properly submitted to the jury for determination of the issues. Admissibility of the depositions of the expert witnesses was sufficiently established to permit their use. No error was committed in permitting plaintiff to inquire of the investigating officer as to the distance between the vehicles at a certain time, after defendant had presented a statement made by him to the officer regarding such distance.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below from an adverse judgment rendered [320]*320upon a jury verdict which awarded damages to plaintiff. Previously this court had reversed a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant. See McNulty v. Garvey, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 234, wherein the principal facts are disclosed. On consideration of the several contentions made on behalf of the appellant, we conclude no reversible error has been shown, and affirm. The charges were properly tailored to the evidence presented, and the cause was properly submitted to the jury for determination of the issues. Admissibility of the depositions of the expert witnesses was sufficiently established to permit their use. No error was committed in permitting plaintiff to inquire of the investigating officer as to the distance between the vehicles at a certain time, after defendant had presented a statement made by him to the officer regarding such distance.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 So. 2d 319, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garvey-v-mcnulty-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack