Garvey v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garvey v. Brown

191 A.D.2d 220, 594 N.Y.S.2d 238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 220 (Garvey v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garvey v. Brown, 191 A.D.2d 220, 594 N.Y.S.2d 238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered November 18, 1991, which, to the extent appealed from, denied petitioner’s application for a preliminary injunction pursuant to CPLR 7502 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Unlike the collective bargaining agreement between the City of New York and the Sergeant’s Benevolent Association, the Lieutenant’s Benevolent Association collective bargaining agreement did not incorporate the terms of either the Impasse Panel report or the 1981 memorandum of agreement on the subject of solo supervisory radio motor patrols, and thus the grievance is not an arbitrable controversy.

We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered November 18, 1991, which, to the extent appealed from, denied petitioner’s application for a preliminary injunction pursuant to CPLR 7502 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Unlike the collective bargaining agreement between the City of New York and the Sergeant’s Benevolent Association, the Lieutenant’s Benevolent Association collective bargaining agreement did not incorporate the terms of either the Impasse Panel report or the 1981 memorandum of agreement on the subject of solo supervisory radio motor patrols, and thus the grievance is not an arbitrable controversy.

We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 220, 594 N.Y.S.2d 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garvey-v-brown-nyappdiv-1993.