Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc.

135 So. 857, 101 Fla. 535

DecidedMay 8, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 857 (Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc., 135 So. 857, 101 Fla. 535 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Bupord, C.J.

The only question presented for consideration in this case which has not been decided adversely to appellant in the opinion in the case of Sun City Holding Company vs. Schoenfield, 97 Fla. 777, 122 Sou. 252, is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decree of the chancellor. The record discloses ample substantial evidence to support the decree. The decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. *536 Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bupord, C.J.

The only question presented for consideration in this case which has not been decided adversely to appellant in the opinion in the case of Sun City Holding Company vs. Schoenfield, 97 Fla. 777, 122 Sou. 252, is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decree of the chancellor. The record discloses ample substantial evidence to support the decree. The decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. *536 Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 857, 101 Fla. 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garver-v-sun-city-holding-co-inc-fla-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack