Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc.

135 So. 857, 101 Fla. 535
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 8, 1931·Published

Opinion

Bupord, C.J.

The only question presented for consideration in this case which has not been decided adversely to appellant in the opinion in the case of Sun City Holding Company vs. Schoenfield, 97 Fla. 777, 122 Sou. 252, is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decree of the chancellor. The record discloses ample substantial evidence to support the decree. The decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. *536 Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc., 135 So. 857, 101 Fla. 535 (Fla. 1931).

135 So. 857 (Garver v. Sun City Holding Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sun City Holding Company v. Schoenfeld
122 So. 252 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)