Garvar v. Faltings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garvar v. Faltings

54 A.D.2d 971, 389 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 971 (Garvar v. Faltings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garvar v. Faltings, 54 A.D.2d 971, 389 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated proceedings, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated October 24, 1975, as, after a hearing, dismissed the appellant’s petition seeking enforcement of a stipulation which was incorporated by reference, but not merged into, a judgment of divorce, which requires the respondent to exercise her best efforts to make the children of the marriage practice Catholicism. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The primary concern of the court in this case is the welfare of the children (see Matter of Paolella v Phillips, 27 Mise 2d 763; Finlay v Finlay, 240 NY 429). A review of the record reveals that the Family Court properly exercised its discretion in denying judicial enforcement of the stipulation. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated proceedings, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated October 24, 1975, as, after a hearing, dismissed the appellant’s petition seeking enforcement of a stipulation which was incorporated by reference, but not merged into, a judgment of divorce, which requires the respondent to exercise her best efforts to make the children of the marriage practice Catholicism. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The primary concern of the court in this case is the welfare of the children (see Matter of Paolella v Phillips, 27 Mise 2d 763; Finlay v Finlay, 240 NY 429). A review of the record reveals that the Family Court properly exercised its discretion in denying judicial enforcement of the stipulation. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 971, 389 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garvar-v-faltings-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack